Skip to main content
Loading Explore guides…
Cold War Inevitability · Acedra
Home
Explore
History
Cold War Inevitability
Sign in to save
Chat
If YouTube asks you to sign in, open the video on YouTube.
Watch on YouTube
Reload player
Transcript
68 segments
Copy
Hide video
0:39
And Going online right now about whether or not the Cold War was amenable given these factors of the two powers these four TV interests
0:52
Finally the ideologies that were being played out whether or not the cold war was inevitable because the term cold war itself is
1:02
used to specifically describe this time period but it is also the most visible and most not an example of two competing powers that cannot that Cannot go to war with each other conventional. They have neither any military capability of overpowering the other nor do they have the Miraval to effectively make this equipment decisive war the memories of the Second World War Certainly played their parts in how the whole war was being waged
1:38
The other understanding is that you do not go up against a power that has nuclear weapons You do not go up against a power that may actually use nuclear weapons given the extreme circumstances the foot of
1:54
a nuclear disaster Was effectively a self-imposed to church they maintained that the Soviet Union and the United States were constantly threatening each other and competing Ideologically and they were fighting the number of proxy wars in the developing world the fact remains that During the 45 year period not a shot was fired by an American soldiers wars or Russia and vice-versa and the other paradoxical thing about that is that Europe which is where most of the armaments the military
2:27
Materials and most of the politics were handled Europe just by proxy becomes the most peaceful You're comfortable pacified. It's not a fashion actually
2:39
emphasize not so much peaceful but statement real essence a peaceful may be stager not vice-versa and The only time that we see a resumption of violence in europe is after the cold war with the breakup of Yugoslavia And his little work that ensue it was Absolutely notified in between the two socks and that may have had more to do with just something they arrived news but the idea that the forth of two major superpowers
3:04
But they're addicts don't war with each other what my results are given World War three which you know the kind of every Time you sent this He said I'm not exactly sure how World War 3 will end or how we fought for World War 4 who is what with stick? some stuffs the idea that in catastrophic nuclear holocaust the dragged around for Was laid bare in the early 1960s with the Cuban Missile Crisis. So reviewing what we were looking at
3:34
Wednesday and picking up from a lot of these points moving forward to death is worth repeating again The Cold War was a by former system of power that was divided along strategic interest ideological outlook and perceptions of national security so you can look at the Cold War from both the realist liberalism in a constructivist point of view that it may even be
3:58
Worth pursuing this for either your second research evaluation or for your final research paper this tool, you know Which which theoretical approach gives you probably the best insight into how the Cold War and other international relations have been waged over the past 20 to 50 60 70 years the thing to note here that Strategic interest is clearly the realism wanna do ideological outlook liberalism and perceptions of national security is certainly
4:29
Constructivist now the one thing that we can certainly take away. This is more empirically historical than Interminably is how both the United States and the Soviet Union pursue said foreign policy the United States Practice its hegemony Being a commercial pacifism and democratic these things at least as far as Europe and North America was gonna strike that's pretty much you know beyond arguments the United States pursued a type of integrative inclusive agenda
5:00
with its major partners in Western Europe and North America
5:05
the Soviet Union on the other hand operated its hegemonic position more through traditional forms of political control and that is making sure that there are compliance slash puppet communist regimes throughout Eastern Europe and Central Europe And of course both countries having nuclear Capabilities just seal the deal that any type of conflict between both sides would result in mutually assured destruction
5:34
the term that was used to describe an a military conflict between these two powers because neither country Had a capability of knocking out the other country in one stress into the assured destruction Meant that the other country which everyone was going to be receiving the nuclear weapons First had at least one chance of striking back So the United States is not not the Soviet Union out in one Nuclear launch the Soviet Union could not do the same with the United States
6:04
Which meant that that would at least be one of more rounds. Where a Country could want to own nuclear missiles and create a catastrophic situation Not only between those two countries, but among its various Alex So beautifully assured destruction was certainly a way of making up deserving. Peace, but definitely insurance available now with all of that month I think it's also worth pointing out that strategic interests can only take us so far as really do I think
6:34
This is being partially soapbox. You are free to agree disagree a little bit if you want But looking back on the Cold War 25 years at more into the past I think it is certainly worth investigating that it was it was a war military Certainly horrified adoption. It was certainly a war of ideology at least in terms of getting Second rates and even third rate powers to Ally One side or the other the United States was pushing the idea that the u.s Stood for freedom democracy liberty
7:11
Independence development all that kind of stuff and they used Western Europe as the you know, mostly photos with a brochure The Soviet learn on the other end unchanged its tactics noticeably half the solitude of Stalin was an old-school Ministerial, you know sort of medieval world war which is simply beautiful satellizer as buffer zones But Soviet Union from Christian on so that communism could be a very lucrative
7:39
Ideology or countries emerging from the periphery to use Wallis things model of world Systems Theory particularly countries emerging from colonial holdings from Western Europe this becomes apparent from the mid sixties, perhaps said
7:58
By the 1980s that ideology morphs into a competing economic cost by the 1980s the United States realizes that it can win the war of ideology By money by a pop culture by what we prefer to have soft power This is something that realists are gonna overlook this is something that liberal lists are going to give some kind of passing reference to but this is something that Constructed it in the gospel
8:25
They constructivism will definitely say that if anything the United States won the war not so much by out spending Soviet eating but that by the 1980s the United States looked simply more appealing the United States A number of things in its pop cultural arsenal that were much more appealing To those the East will be West than those in the West looking east So there's a lot of ways in which he can look at me second half of the Cold War
8:58
particularly in relation to either of the two superpowers and how it is responding to another country and I'm going to be using Wallerstein's world Systems Theory model throughout the lecture today to kind of give you this Understanding about how these countries were linked to their course to their core allies as well as to their equivalents First thing to understand. Okay first thing to understand here is that
9:25
the United States had different foreign policies Depending upon where it was focused as far as Western Europe and North America is concerned this was the heart and soul of America's transatlantic economic collaboration that Came from the office To the demanding world of the other again the United States still assumed this position of superiority
9:51
Which was already codified in a previous document known as the Monroe Doctrine the Monroe Doctrine already place of the United States in a position above Its developing neighbors particularly Latin in Central America. The Truman Doctrine was war reasons additive to the whole scenario Implies. The United States is going to weigh. No sodium realism to those countries that wish for us protection The Soviet Union on the other hand is going to answer that's notable
10:25
hierarchical support and start egging on a number of these developing countries in the periphery to Consider communism as a better alternative To market capitalism simply because communism at least in theory allows these Developing countries to use their own raw materials and natural resources for their own bed Under the u.s supported system the United States and other Corporate country simply going to extract these raw materials for their own industrial
10:59
Benefit as well as look at these countries has little more than compliant states and this we see most notably in the proxy areas of Africa Southeast Asia Latin America and the Middle East so the only area that becomes somewhat off-limits Okay, is your both Western and Eastern simply because of the military presence? We also have to take a few moments to note that communism did have some further successes countries opting to go the communist raps were the countries that had some
11:35
industrial capability well before the market economy kicked in One very notable examples one of the very few times that we will speak positively about people
11:49
Without
11:57
Really was the better career up until I would say the late seventies early eighties It was you know, if you kind of think back to people reading of sort of the united Korea
12:09
The northern tip was where the Japanese occupying powers got most of their raw materials most of their industrial capacities most of the is mostly being intelligentsia was located in what would become Korea South Korea was very agricultural. Very rural very backward Very different today North Korea under Kim fields song was know it to be more of a showpiece Than a blueberry And we see this in a number of other emerging countries particularly in Central Africa as well
12:42
countries that had opted for the communist model And so because it was the better option to Develop their own social economic and cultural resources there's a type of national copy Even though he said this is more the Chinese model than the Soviets Estonia is kind of played into this only because he gave me a list but the Chinese model under math was really the global standard
13:11
International communism National Socialism, even though it was a term
13:21
But the Chinese version of communism was certainly a marketable product for a couple of reasons number one
13:29
China's version of communism did already assumed that the vast majority of pets in the rural developing areas Never really bothered to sit down and read Marx. Let's be honest Marx wrote a lot of stuff Marx isn't exactly the most easy dream to make right You've got the Communist Manifesto, which is a little thing to leaf through during your labor strikes, but Marxism Basically implies that the workers are going to be already so much educated so much skilled and still politically active
14:02
The Chinese version of communism doesn't even further than the Soviet version Soviet version is basically involved vehicle or love Dissipated keep calling didn't invent it works, but the people get in on the other hand I can totally get Yeah, but in this case Communism is a national liberation movement not a class-based movement Not a movement that you just fly the stitch that will prevent other powers from exploiting said statement repeat that against
14:35
This notion of national communism was not in favor of eliminating mistakes along Marxist fears War has a way of giving hegemonic power to a core group of elites whether it's about technology ho Chi Minh in Vietnam Fidel Castro in Cuba Or Che Guevara wherever they would give him a place to crash for the night to whatever it was enough in this regard Okay communism becomes more of a national liberation struggle and takes this on very very Visibly both in Southeast Asia as we see in Vietnam
15:11
Cambodia Other places ain't even more salt flatten America where it becomes where communism in this case is almost synonymous with into colonialism and imperialism works in South America is also very very critical of US economics, okay. So in this regard the Soviets may have found their ace in the hole by exploiting Elongate Marxian axiom and more, you know, the more, you know the frustration The frustration is called the periphery the rage against the core
15:45
Okay, that's something to keep into account. This is where you're fighting college. You really eat enough and more importantly If we accept this hypothesis
15:55
if we accept this hypothesis as to the general understanding about why the United States made a number of Corner cut number of orders in its foreign policy That kind of did away with supporting democracies and did more toward supporting Compliant pro-western regimes this would be a little bit more clear as the lecture goes on All right. So we've talked about the periphery. Let's then talk about the core here. I want to this qualifier. I'm not using Wallerstein's
16:25
core model, exclusively, which denotes develops industrialized States What I'm doing here is taking the notion of the poor as the primary states within an alliance system But also knowing which countries were key allies Of either Washington or Moscow and made that apparent in the lecture Wednesday whose ones were you know? Keep horrors in this map The first thing to understand is that the United States and this goes back to where I was just talking about long ago in this
16:59
situation the United States plays the literalist part U.s. Foreign policy is certainly pronounced by patterns of commercial pacifism and by patterns of democratic transition theory Okay, America's transatlantic relationship specific grigorik Canada France, West Germany
17:22
The Low Countries Belgium Luxembourg Millers Italy Spain on Franco finally, dr Trust me the United States isolate Spain under Franco either the United States swore that the North Atlantic was a key strategic area not just for military capabilities also for rebuilding
17:44
maintaining a healthy trans economic cooperative
17:50
This is basically the rudimentary foundations of the global free market today That's why I said Adam Smith tends to be more of the victor at the end of the Cold War then Thomas Jefferson
18:02
The other thing that we got to understand is and I will give complete deafness to the realists under sense Is that this transatlantic cooperation took place amid a larger framework?
18:14
Military security specifically through danger
18:18
Now maybe there was one of the most successful international organizations in modern discipline
18:26
NATO is successful simply because of its limited and Strategic objectives and having need to provide collective military security but it also implies Is that the United States is? has been and as long as this theme continues pretty much will be the military edge along with getting that alliance that Stop saying the United States is trying to exploit us what it does say is this the United States through native tells its allies Don't worry about military spending
19:03
traditionally states need to allocate a certain percentage of their revenues every year towards military spending towards Security the United States effectively said in so many words You can spend whatever money that you want on your own Defense Force But we're going to be the primary Military in Europe if there's a war blow a whistle and one of our staff sergeants more gears and we'll come right Now, what does that do? To unbelievably beneficial things number one the notion that another country
19:36
has effectively blank checked your Security means that you can focus your time energy and resources on other business economic cultural Institutional the second thing and this is a bit more of micro economic is that let's just take a country like Germany
19:56
the United States told the Western governments After it was, you know reformed in 1949 1950 it again in so many words guys Look every time we give you an army you do something stupid minutes Every time if you get an army or attendant get a little crazy with their army a world war breaks out. So here's the Peace agreement. We're going to rebuild your country. We're going to provide you security you're going to have the military That's a little bit more than token defensible
20:28
150,000 that's about it. Okay, no armored brigades. No major air for rappelling. Here's another thing You can't send your arm again to another country for? Obvious reasons, right?
20:40
But here's the thing in return the West German government does not have to invest its necessary funds for military spending Which means that it's economic? It is double the amount of money that would evolve into economic investment their their money that would traditionally go to a military. Oh
21:03
There's a double there's a total investment in the economy This is the reason why the European economic system particularly in the West picks up so quickly This is the reason why the German economy picks up so quickly by the mid-to by the mid-1950s Everyone was talking about the German economic miracle. Yes. Germans are efficient. Yes during products are good. We also have to take into account Germany is not investing in a major military. So a rigorous argument could be
21:31
once you have that all-encompassing security once you have effectively Pacified the region with a superior military and everyone within that military alliance Chooses to play by the rules and acknowledge the United States as the Alpha in the pack then and only then can you spend time really developing your economy and developing Transnational institutional links in other worlds commercial pacifism and Democratic peace theory can work
22:05
But it can work even better if all sides know that there is no threat of invasion if there is no threat of war hence The reason why the French and the Germans got along so marvelously well After the Second World War like the United States is basically playing chevre So the thing to take away here, is that security assurances through NATO. Give us the opportunity to develop
22:31
Mutually dependent economic relations under what historians and economists develop has been Bretton Woods Agreement the Bretton Woods agreements comes out of nineteen four is basically the foundation Of what would be America's transatlantic?
22:48
Economic free trade zone and out of these wonderful things in Europe the Marshall Plan is the first thing that helps to rebuild refund and revitalize Europe Again, economically speaking. It pays to pump money into your major allies So their economy can be top-notch Otherwise the United States is going to be freeing the bill for a very very long time and the second one and what that really depends into the European Union today, is those that umpires
23:20
Creates the condition for the student leg
23:23
which effectively Establishes the European Coal and Steel Commission because we know today is now the modern-day European Union in other words NATO Should be given a significant degree of press for providing for the foundations of modern Transnational global trade security gives you the ability to think about other stuff But you don't have security all that you're doing is thinking about getting security This one excess not that big across On the opposite side of the wall in the Soviet sphere
23:59
There was less this type of inclusive cooperation and more any type of top-down control
24:06
Stalin basically sought to control everything through good ol'-fashioned agenda means people after Stalin came up with a better idea It's a bit more cost-effective, but it doesn't do anything in the long run. It is basically ensuring compliance and
24:21
partnership through a series of bureaucratically Authoritarian alliances and we see that in at least one We see that there's at least one uprising in every Soviet satellite of Eastern Europe East Germany. 1953 Hungary 1956 Czechoslovakia 1969 old 1981 and in each of these uprisings
24:45
either the Red Army comes in washes, the Would-be revolution or it's an internal coup to avoid the Red Army coming in the results of the same and ensuing Bureaucratic authoritarian regime that basically tries to keep the Soviets happy and keep these old guards these more bureaucratic people can control Romanians this way until
25:10
1989 Eastern Europe, basically, it's kind of a trapeze and Just sort of stays in this bubble
25:20
Until the ladies it's around the world on the other hand the people see the market communism. China 1949 North Korea 1953 Vietnam with the first visible Military victory of a native population against a colonial power the Ho Chi Minh's victory at the invent boom in 1954 effectively ended French colonial rule And of course it began the long and very drawn out painful Relationship that the United States had with Southeast Asian when the French do one final thing on their way now
25:55
If thought of America and they say can you bail us out? Can you take care of this little problem in Indochina? It would come back to haunt them that twenty years later and of course Cuba 1959 Castro comes to power New Year's Day take that and then the final three Afghanistan 1981 so the notion that communism is kind of moving around the world puts the United States into a far more Defensive position as well. It can be both It can be inclusive in one part of the world
26:29
The transatlantic area because that's the one place that Soviet Union is not screwing with their developing world the United States Loses patience faster and faster for countries democratizing and begins to option for the person
26:45
Extending its position in the developing world before soviets get to
Here to help you learn
Sign in to keep a private conversation with your course tutor.
Ask me anything about the material…
Sign in to chat